01 · 6 questions
1 Strategy, Governance and Culture
DevSecOps strategy, executive sponsorship, secure development policy and coding standard, shared responsibility, security champions, role-based training
Software Engineering and DevOps Assessment
Evaluates DevSecOps maturity across strategy and culture, threat modeling and secure design, secure pipelines, software supply chain, AI and automation security, application vulnerability remediation, runtime security, and compliance and improvement.
Already have an account? Log in to start
CISO / VP Engineering / Head of Application Security / DevOps Lead / Platform Engineering Manager. Secondary: audit teams and development leads.
Finds gaps across security-integrated delivery: not just whether SAST exists, but whether it blocks builds, whether developers see findings, and whether design, supply chain, secrets and runtime are covered. Exposes tools without integration and gives each gap a concrete next step and a measurable target.
DevSecOps makes security an automated part of software delivery, not a gate teams route around, a report that arrives two weeks after release, or a yearly penetration test that finds what pipeline tools should have caught months earlier.
This assessment follows the order in which security is built into delivery: strategy, sponsorship, policy, shared responsibility, champions and training; secure design through requirements, threat modeling, patterns, attack surface and abuse cases; a hardened pipeline with SAST, security review, DAST, IaC and container scanning, blocking gates, configuration validation and secrets drawn from the enterprise vault; the supply chain through composition analysis, registry governance, dependency hygiene, ephemeral builds, signing, SBOMs and AI models; AI and automation security covering generated code, agent permissions, prompt injection and AI feature testing; application remediation through one backlog, enterprise deadlines, automated fixes, penetration testing and external findings; runtime security; and governance through policy as code, audit trails, metrics and improvement.
Questions marked (Bridge) check the link to a companion model without repeating it: Non-Human Identity and Secrets Management for vaulting and rotation, Vulnerability and Patch Management for enterprise deadlines, exceptions and disclosure, and the Security Operations Center model for monitoring and detection. Each question is scored on whether the practice is documented, implemented and effective, which exposes tools bought and documented but not integrated, or integrated with gates left on advisory.
Each domain is a group of related questions, scored on its own and rolled up into your overall result.
01 · 6 questions
DevSecOps strategy, executive sponsorship, secure development policy and coding standard, shared responsibility, security champions, role-based training
02 · 6 questions
Security requirements, threat modeling, living threat models, secure design patterns, attack surface management, abuse case testing
03 · 10 questions
Pipeline security, SAST, security code review, DAST, IaC and container scanning, automated gates, developer feedback, configuration validation and pipeline secrets from the enterprise vault
04 · 6 questions
Composition analysis, registry governance, dependency hygiene, ephemeral builds, artifact signing and SBOMs
05 · 5 questions
Security of AI-generated code, AI agent permissions in repositories and pipelines, prompt injection defense in developer tools, the AI model and dataset supply chain and security testing of AI features
06 · 5 questions
Consolidated application findings, alignment with enterprise remediation deadlines, automated fix pull requests, application penetration testing and routing of external findings
07 · 5 questions
Security logging, application events to the SOC, anomaly alerting, runtime protection and application security incident response
08 · 6 questions
Policy as code, release audit trail, integrated security metrics, benchmarking, improvement register and maturity self-assessment
Measures that show whether the improvements hold.
| KPI |
|---|
| Mean Time to Remediate - Average time from vulnerability detection to verified fix in production. Target: under 48 hours for critical. |
| Vulnerability Escape Rate - Share of production vulnerabilities that pipeline tools could have caught. Target: under 5%. |
| Security Gate Pass Rate - Share of builds passing all security gates without exception. Target: 90% or higher. |
| Dependency Currency - Share of third-party dependencies within one major version of current. Target: 85% or higher. |
| SBOM Coverage - Share of production releases with a complete, machine-readable SBOM. Target: 100%. |
Questions are written in plain language and mapped to:
Practices this assessment relies on. Assessing them too gives a fuller picture.
An overall score and a score for each of the 8 domains.
A clear view of where current practice falls short, and why it matters.
Prioritized next steps to move each area to the next level.
Results you can share with leadership and track over time.
Register, take the assessment, and get your maturity score with a clear improvement roadmap.
Assessment Platform
Contact us
Business Bay, Dubai, UAE
info@itsgovernance.com
+971 586 697 263
Get Started
© 2026 ITSGovernance, part of SMCE. All rights reserved. Cookie settings