01 · 9 questions
1 PMO Mandate and Project Governance
PMO charter, executive sponsorship, strategic alignment, PMO resourcing, governance framework and tiers, decision rights and tolerances, project boards, exception escalation
Portfolio, Program and Project Management Assessment
A maturity assessment of project, program and portfolio management across PMO mandate and governance, work classification and standards, planning and baselines, project control, resources and contracts, stakeholders and change, quality, closure and benefits, portfolio and program oversight, people, culture and tooling, and performance improvement.
Already have an account? Log in to start
Primary: Head of PMO and Portfolio Director. Secondary: program and project managers, project controls, executive sponsors and board members, finance business partners, procurement and contract managers, business and benefit owners, and line managers who run operationally funded projects.
Shows how reliably approved work becomes delivered outcomes: where project-sized work escapes the portfolio, where estimates, schedules and reserves cannot be trusted, where governance and control break down, where contracts and resources leak cost, and which improvements will most raise on-time, on-budget and benefit delivery. The result is a prioritized, evidence-based plan tied to named documents and measurable targets.
Projects should succeed because of the system around them, not the heroics of a few strong project managers. In immature organizations, large upgrades run as business as usual because they are not new spend, projects start without a real business case, estimates are optimistic guesses, schedules have no working critical path, contingency is spent on anything, contractor variations arrive as surprises, status reports stay green until the week before failure, and nobody checks whether benefits ever arrived.
This assessment starts with the PMO mandate and governance: charter, sponsorship, strategic alignment, decision rights, boards and escalation. It then asks whether work is classified by clear rules into portfolio components, programs, projects, minor work and operational work, and whether project-sized work run by line teams from operating budgets follows a light track that keeps it visible without heavy paperwork. It checks common standards, lifecycle, approach selection, business cases with sustainability targets and stage gates; then requirements, estimating, schedule quality, contingency and reserve, baselines and acceptance. It tests risk, issues, change, status reporting, forecasting and earned value; resources, procurement and contract administration; stakeholder engagement and organizational change; quality, assurance, handover, benefits and lessons; portfolio visibility, prioritization, program coordination, dependencies, health reviews and stopping projects; and finally competency, culture, tooling, AI-assisted project management and the PMO improvement program.
Each question is scored on three dimensions: Documented, Implemented and Effective. This exposes methods that exist on paper but not in daily work, practices that work only because certain people run them, and controls that run but are never measured. The result is a prioritized improvement plan tied to named documents, measurable targets and the dependencies between practices, aligned with ISO 21500 family standards, the PMBOK Guide 8th Edition, PRINCE2 7, COBIT 2019 and the Saudi EXPRO National Manual for Project Management.
Each domain is a group of related questions, scored on its own and rolled up into your overall result.
01 · 9 questions
PMO charter, executive sponsorship, strategic alignment, PMO resourcing, governance framework and tiers, decision rights and tolerances, project boards, exception escalation
02 · 8 questions
Work classification, operational project light track, methodology and templates, lifecycle, delivery approach selection, business case, sustainability targets, stage gate decisions
03 · 7 questions
Requirements and traceability, integrated planning, estimating method, schedule quality and critical path, contingency and management reserve, baselines, acceptance criteria
04 · 6 questions
Risk, issues, change control, honest status reporting, cost forecasting, earned value
05 · 6 questions
Resource allocation, capacity and utilization, skills inventory, conflict resolution, project procurement, contract administration and variations
06 · 5 questions
Stakeholder engagement, communication planning, stakeholder satisfaction, organizational change, project information management
07 · 7 questions
Quality standards, benefits planning, independent assurance, operational handover, post-project benefit reviews, lessons learned
08 · 9 questions
Portfolio visibility, in-flight reprioritization, portfolio balance, program coordination, cross-project dependencies, health reviews, aggregated risk, termination, value recovery
09 · 6 questions
Competency framework, career path, community of practice, accountability culture, portfolio tooling, AI-assisted project management
10 · 6 questions
PMO performance, portfolio value reporting, estimation accuracy, delivery trends, benchmarking, PMO improvement program
Measures that show whether the improvements hold.
| KPI |
|---|
| Gate Integrity - Projects passing a stage gate without meeting exit criteria or a recorded waiver, per quarter. Target: 0. |
| Schedule Quality - Share of major project schedules passing the schedule quality checks at baseline and each monthly update. Target: at least 90%. |
| Forecast Accuracy - Share of closed projects whose forecast three months before close was within 10% of final cost. Target: at least 80%. |
| Red Project Decisions - Share of red-rated projects with a recorded recovery or stop decision within one review cycle. Target: 100%. |
| On-Time, On-Budget Delivery - Share of closed projects finishing within schedule and cost tolerances of their final baseline. Target: at least 75%. |
Questions are written in plain language and mapped to:
Practices this assessment relies on. Assessing them too gives a fuller picture.
An overall score and a score for each of the 10 domains.
A clear view of where current practice falls short, and why it matters.
Prioritized next steps to move each area to the next level.
Results you can share with leadership and track over time.
Register, take the assessment, and get your maturity score with a clear improvement roadmap.
Assessment Platform
Contact us
Business Bay, Dubai, UAE
info@itsgovernance.com
+971 586 697 263
Get Started
© 2026 ITSGovernance, part of SMCE. All rights reserved. Cookie settings