01 · 5 questions
1 SMS Context and Scope
Context and issues, interested parties and service requirements, SMS scope statement, SMS design and process interface map, processes run by other parties
IT Service Management Assessment
The entry model and hub of the IT Service Management family. It rates the service management system as a whole, from context, scope, policy, ownership and the Service Management Plan through resources, competence, documents, the service portfolio, measurement, internal audit, management review and corrective action, and adds a Practice Health Snapshot of 18 practices that routes each gap to its deep-dive model.
Already have an account? Log in to start
Primary: the SMS owner, head of service management or chief information officer. Secondary: top management and governance forum members, practice and process owners, service owners and delivery teams, and internal audit, risk and compliance staff.
Gives the SMS owner two clear results. The SMS score shows whether the system that holds the practices together is defined, run and improved: scope, policy, ownership, plan and objectives, resources, audit, management review and corrective action. The practice profile shows which of 18 practices are weak and points each gap to the deep-dive model and the exact questions to run next, so assessment effort goes where it is needed. Together they give a prioritized, evidence-based improvement plan and a view of readiness for ISO/IEC 20000-1 certification or customer assurance.
Many organizations run sound individual practices, such as incident, change or service level management, yet have no system that holds them together: no agreed scope, no single policy above the practice policies, no plan with measurable objectives, no audit program, and no management review that acts on results. This assessment tests that system at the level of the whole, following the clause structure of ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 without re-testing practice depth. Domain 1 covers context, interested parties and service requirements, the SMS scope, the process interface map and processes run by other parties. Domain 2 covers top management commitment, the Service Management Policy, alignment of practice policies, the SMS owner and process owners, the governance forum and decision rights, and integration with other management systems. Domain 3 covers the SMS risk approach, risk and opportunity actions, the Service Management Plan and objectives, the objective cascade, delivery plans and control of changes to the SMS itself. Domain 4 covers resources, competence, awareness, communication and documented information control. Domain 5 covers the service portfolio view, planning against demand, budget and capacity, operational control, delivery to plan, control of other parties, the new or changed service gate and the portfolio review. Domain 6 covers the measurement plan, internal audit, auditor independence, management review, service reporting to governance and certification readiness. Domain 7 covers nonconformity routing, corrective action effectiveness, SMS-level improvements, automations and AI agents acting in SMS processes, and the annual SMS maturity review. These seven domains give the SMS result. Domain 8, the Practice Health Snapshot, has its own row on the Dashboard and is read as a separate practice profile, question by question, so that one weak practice does not hide a sound system, or the reverse. The workbook's overall percentage includes all 58 questions, so use the Domain 1 to 7 rows when judging the SMS itself. Owner's note: Questions 8.1 to 8.18 are practice self-evaluations: rate Documented for the policy, process and procedures kept current; Implemented for consistent use with configured tools; Effective for the deep-dive measure at target. The result points to the matching deep-dive model and the questions to run next. In the snapshot recommendations, a "Q" prefix refers to the deep-dive model, not to this model: "Q2.4" means question 2.4 of the named deep-dive model.
Each domain is a group of related questions, scored on its own and rolled up into your overall result.
01 · 5 questions
Context and issues, interested parties and service requirements, SMS scope statement, SMS design and process interface map, processes run by other parties
02 · 6 questions
Top management commitment, Service Management Policy, practice policies under the policy and the Technology Policy Framework (Hub A), SMS owner and process ownership, governance forum and delegated authority, integration with other management systems
03 · 6 questions
SMS risk approach and acceptance criteria (IT Risk register), risk and opportunity actions, Service Management Plan and objectives, objective cascade (IT Performance KPI Catalog), plans to achieve objectives, SMS change control
04 · 5 questions
Resources across practices, SMS competence (Technology Workforce Readiness), awareness, communication plan, documented information register and control
05 · 7 questions
One portfolio view, planning services against demand, budget and capacity, operational planning and control, delivery to plan, control of other parties, new or changed service gate, portfolio review decisions
06 · 6 questions
SMS measurement plan (KPI Catalog), internal audit program, auditor independence and results, management review, service reporting (bridge), certification readiness
07 · 5 questions
Nonconformity routing to the Continual Improvement Register, corrective action effectiveness, SMS-level improvements, automation and AI agents as process performers, annual SMS maturity review
08 · 18 questions
One outcome-level question per ITSM practice owned by a deep dive: is the practice defined, run consistently, measured and improving; each routes a low score to its deep dive
Measures that show whether the improvements hold.
| KPI |
|---|
| SM Objectives on Track - Share of service management objectives on track or achieved at the last plan review. Target: at least 80%. |
| Service Level Targets Met - Share of agreed service level targets met in the period across in-scope services. Target: at least 95%. |
| Audit Program Coverage - Share of SMS requirements and processes audited within the program cycle. Target: 100%. |
| Repeat Nonconformities - Number of SMS nonconformities that recur within 12 months of closure. Target: 0. |
| SMS Roadmap Actions on Schedule - Share of SMS maturity roadmap actions due in the period completed on schedule. Target: at least 80%. |
Questions are written in plain language and mapped to:
Practices this assessment relies on. Assessing them too gives a fuller picture.
An overall score and a score for each of the 8 domains.
A clear view of where current practice falls short, and why it matters.
Prioritized next steps to move each area to the next level.
Results you can share with leadership and track over time.
Register, take the assessment, and get your maturity score with a clear improvement roadmap.
Assessment Platform
Contact us
Business Bay, Dubai, UAE
info@itsgovernance.com
+971 586 697 263
Get Started
© 2026 ITSGovernance, part of SMCE. All rights reserved. Cookie settings